Liquid Biopsy: How Circulating Tumor DNA Is Changing Cancer Monitoring

Liquid Biopsy: How Circulating Tumor DNA Is Changing Cancer Monitoring
Dec, 4 2025 Finnegan O'Sullivan

For years, checking if cancer was growing or shrinking meant going under the knife-literally. A tissue biopsy, while accurate, was painful, risky, and often impossible to repeat. Now, a simple blood draw is giving doctors a real-time window into what’s happening inside a tumor. This isn’t science fiction. It’s circulating tumor DNA, or ctDNA, and it’s reshaping how cancer is tracked, treated, and managed.

What Is Circulating Tumor DNA?

When cancer cells die, they break apart and spill bits of their DNA into the bloodstream. These fragments are called circulating tumor DNA, or ctDNA. Unlike healthy DNA floating around, ctDNA carries the exact genetic mistakes that make cancer cells behave badly-mutations in genes like EGFR, KRAS, or BRCA. The trick is finding them. There’s maybe one cancer DNA fragment for every 10,000 normal ones in a blood sample. But modern tools like digital droplet PCR and next-generation sequencing can spot them.

This isn’t about finding cancer cells floating around-it’s about reading their genetic fingerprints. That’s why ctDNA is more powerful than older methods like looking for whole tumor cells in blood. You don’t need the whole cell. Just the broken pieces of its DNA tell you what’s going on.

Why It Beats Traditional Biopsies

Traditional biopsies grab a tiny piece of tumor from one spot. But tumors aren’t uniform. One part might have a mutation that makes it respond to a drug, while another part doesn’t. That’s called tumor heterogeneity. A single biopsy can miss up to 30% of these key changes.

Liquid biopsy pulls DNA from all over the body. It’s like getting a full snapshot instead of a single photo. That’s why it’s better at spotting resistance. If a tumor starts mutating to escape treatment, ctDNA picks it up fast-often months before a scan shows any growth.

And it’s safer. A lung biopsy can cause a collapsed lung. A liver biopsy risks bleeding. A brain biopsy? Nearly impossible without major surgery. Liquid biopsy? A needle in the arm. No hospital stay. No recovery time. Patients can get tested every few weeks without stress.

How It’s Used in Real-World Cancer Care

At major cancer centers like MD Anderson, liquid biopsies are now routine for patients with advanced lung, colorectal, or breast cancer. Here’s how it works in practice:

  • Early detection after surgery: After removing a tumor, doctors check ctDNA to see if any cancer cells are still hiding. If ctDNA is found, it means the cancer is likely to come back-often 6 to 11 months before a scan shows anything. That gives time to start treatment early.
  • Tracking treatment response: If a drug is working, ctDNA levels drop. If they rise, it’s a sign the treatment is failing. This helps doctors switch therapies faster, without waiting for tumors to grow on scans.
  • Finding targetable mutations: In lung cancer, about 92% of cases where tissue wasn’t enough for testing had actionable mutations found in ctDNA. That means patients who would’ve missed out on life-extending drugs now get them.
  • Spotting resistance: When a drug stops working, ctDNA can reveal why. Is it a new EGFR mutation? A change in the KRAS gene? This tells doctors exactly which next drug to try.

One patient in Birmingham, diagnosed with stage IV colon cancer, had ctDNA tested every six weeks during treatment. After three months, her levels dropped to near zero. Three months later, they started rising again-even though her CT scan looked fine. Her oncologist switched her to a new targeted therapy. By the time the scan showed progression, she’d already been on a better drug for two months.

A superhero ctDNA molecule defeating a broken biopsy needle, with tumor heterogeneity shown in a split-screen.

The Limits of Liquid Biopsy

It’s not magic. Liquid biopsy has blind spots.

For early-stage cancers-stage I or II-ctDNA levels are often too low to detect. Sensitivity drops to 50-70%. That means one in two early cancers might be missed. It’s not reliable for screening healthy people yet.

Some cancers just don’t shed much DNA. Brain tumors, slow-growing prostate cancers, and certain blood cancers often give false negatives. In these cases, a tissue biopsy is still needed.

And not every DNA change means cancer. Older adults often have harmless mutations in their blood cells-called clonal hematopoiesis. These can look like cancer mutations. Labs now use special filters to spot these, but mistakes still happen. About 15-20% of reports show variants of unknown significance-changes we don’t fully understand yet.

Even the test itself isn’t standardized. Two labs testing the same blood sample might give different results. That’s why guidelines now say: use FDA-approved tests like Guardant360 CDx or FoundationOne Liquid CDx when possible.

What’s Next: Methylation, Fragmentomics, and AI

The next wave isn’t just about mutations. Scientists are now looking at how ctDNA is shaped.

Normal DNA breaks in predictable ways. Cancer DNA breaks differently-shorter, longer, tangled up. These patterns, called fragmentomics, are unique to tumor type. Combine that with methylation (chemical tags on DNA that turn genes on or off), and you get a much clearer picture.

Studies show that adding methylation analysis boosts detection rates by 20-30%. For early-stage cancers, that could be the difference between catching it in time or not.

And then there’s AI. At MD Anderson, machine learning models now analyze ctDNA fragment patterns to predict tumor origin and aggressiveness. Early results show a 15-20% boost in accuracy. Imagine a blood test that not only says “cancer is here” but also “this is likely lung cancer, it’s growing fast, and it’s resistant to drug X.” That’s the goal.

A blood vial turning into a holographic tumor with methylation tags, doctor and patient celebrating in CalArts style.

Who Gets Tested? And How Often?

Right now, liquid biopsy is mainly for patients with advanced cancer. Guidelines from ASCO and NCCN recommend it for:

  • Advanced non-small cell lung cancer when tissue isn’t available
  • Metastatic colorectal cancer to check for KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations
  • HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer to monitor treatment response

Testing frequency depends on the situation:

  • During active treatment: Every 4 to 8 weeks
  • After treatment ends: Every 3 to 6 months for surveillance
  • For recurrence risk: Once after surgery, then again at 3 and 6 months

Cost is still a barrier. In the UK, NHS coverage is limited to specific cases. Private tests range from £500 to £1,500. But prices are falling fast. As adoption grows, insurance and public health systems will follow.

The Bigger Picture: A New Standard of Care

The global liquid biopsy market is expected to hit $19.5 billion by 2030. That’s not just because it’s trendy-it’s because it works.

Doctors report a 25-30% drop in repeat tissue biopsies since liquid biopsy became available. Patients avoid complications. Hospitals save money. Treatment becomes more precise.

Experts agree: within five to seven years, liquid biopsy won’t be an option. It’ll be the standard. For monitoring. For guiding therapy. For catching recurrence before it spreads.

It’s not replacing tissue biopsy. It’s complementing it. Tissue still gives the full picture. But ctDNA gives the real-time story. Together, they’re making cancer care smarter, faster, and kinder.

Can liquid biopsy detect cancer early?

Liquid biopsy can detect some early-stage cancers, but not reliably yet. Sensitivity for stage I cancers is only 50-70%, meaning nearly half may be missed. It’s most effective for monitoring known cancer or checking for recurrence after treatment. For true early screening in healthy people, methylation-based tests are showing promise but aren’t ready for routine use.

Is liquid biopsy covered by insurance or the NHS?

In the UK, the NHS covers liquid biopsy for specific advanced cancers-like non-small cell lung cancer-when tissue biopsy isn’t possible. For other uses, such as monitoring or recurrence checks, coverage varies by region and hospital. Private testing is available but can cost between £500 and £1,500. Insurance in the US typically covers FDA-approved tests for approved indications.

Can ctDNA distinguish between cancer and other conditions?

Sometimes, no. Aging can cause harmless mutations in blood cells called clonal hematopoiesis, which look like cancer DNA. Labs use filters to spot these, but false positives still happen in 10-15% of patients over 65. That’s why results are always interpreted alongside imaging, symptoms, and medical history-not in isolation.

How long does it take to get results from a liquid biopsy?

Results typically take 7 to 14 days. Some labs offer faster turnaround (5-7 days) for urgent cases, like when a patient’s treatment needs to be changed quickly. Standard tests take longer because they require deep sequencing and complex bioinformatics analysis.

Does a negative liquid biopsy mean I’m cancer-free?

Not necessarily. A negative result means no ctDNA was detected at the time of testing. But if the tumor sheds very little DNA-like in brain or prostate cancer-it could still be there. Negative results must be interpreted with caution, especially in cancers known to have low ctDNA release. Imaging and clinical symptoms still matter.

Can liquid biopsy replace imaging like CT or MRI scans?

No. Imaging shows where tumors are and how big they are. ctDNA tells you what’s happening genetically. They work together. A scan might show a tumor shrinking, but ctDNA could reveal it’s still mutating and resistant. Conversely, ctDNA might rise before a tumor is visible on a scan. Both are needed for full picture.

What Should Patients Do?

If you’re undergoing treatment for advanced cancer, ask your oncologist: “Is liquid biopsy right for me?” If you’ve had surgery and are in follow-up, ask if ctDNA testing can help monitor for recurrence. Don’t assume it’s automatic-it’s still not offered everywhere.

Keep in mind: this isn’t a test you can order online. It requires a doctor’s order, proper lab processing, and expert interpretation. But it’s no longer experimental. It’s part of modern oncology-and it’s getting better every year.

15 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    Michael Dioso

    December 5, 2025 AT 19:47
    So let me get this straight-we’re replacing surgery with a blood test and calling it progress? I’ve seen too many patients get false hope from these so-called liquid biopsies. One positive result and suddenly they’re skipping chemo for some magic DNA potion. It’s not a crystal ball, it’s a noisy signal with a 30% error rate. Don’t believe the hype.
  • Image placeholder

    Norene Fulwiler

    December 7, 2025 AT 07:33
    I work with cancer patients every day. This isn’t just tech-it’s dignity. One woman I cared for had three failed biopsies before we got ctDNA results. She cried because she didn’t have to be cut open again. That’s the real win. Not the cost, not the hype-just letting people live without trauma.
  • Image placeholder

    Chris Brown

    December 8, 2025 AT 11:54
    The medical-industrial complex has spoken. Liquid biopsy is the new holy grail. But let us not forget: if it were truly revolutionary, the FDA would have mandated it universally. Instead, it’s a niche tool for the wealthy. The real innovation? Selling hope as a subscription service.
  • Image placeholder

    Stephanie Fiero

    December 8, 2025 AT 13:05
    Yessss this is huge!!! My cousin just started on a new drug because ctDNA showed a mutation the tissue biopsy missed. She’s been in remission for 8 months now. I know it’s not perfect but it’s giving people TIME. And time is everything. 💪❤️
  • Image placeholder

    Krishan Patel

    December 8, 2025 AT 21:02
    You speak of ctDNA as if it were divine revelation. But DNA is merely a script written by entropy. The body is not a machine to be debugged with sequencing. True healing lies in balance, in harmony with nature-not in dissecting fragments of decay with machines built by Silicon Valley.
  • Image placeholder

    sean whitfield

    December 10, 2025 AT 12:46
    So you’re telling me we can now detect cancer by reading tiny DNA crumbs in blood… but we still can’t figure out why my WiFi drops every Tuesday? Priorities, people.
  • Image placeholder

    Carole Nkosi

    December 12, 2025 AT 10:49
    This is what happens when you let algorithms replace intuition. You think you’re detecting cancer but you’re just amplifying noise. The body speaks in rhythms, not SNPs. These tests are colonial science-extracting data from bodies without understanding the soul behind them.
  • Image placeholder

    Stephanie Bodde

    December 13, 2025 AT 14:08
    This is the kind of thing that gives me hope. My mom had stage III breast cancer and they used ctDNA to catch recurrence before it showed on scans. I’m so grateful for science like this. 🙏❤️
  • Image placeholder

    ashlie perry

    December 15, 2025 AT 03:23
    They’re lying about the accuracy. The labs are paid by pharma. The ‘FDA-approved’ ones? Same companies that make the drugs. They want you to keep testing so you keep buying meds. Wake up. It’s a money loop disguised as medicine.
  • Image placeholder

    Juliet Morgan

    December 16, 2025 AT 06:25
    I just wanted to say thank you for writing this. My sister’s oncologist just started using ctDNA and it made all the difference. It’s not perfect but it’s kinder. And sometimes that’s enough.
  • Image placeholder

    William Chin

    December 17, 2025 AT 15:58
    The clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA remains statistically inconclusive in prospective trials beyond metastatic settings. While the technological sophistication is laudable, the extrapolation of sensitivity metrics to population-level outcomes is premature and potentially misleading.
  • Image placeholder

    Ada Maklagina

    December 18, 2025 AT 02:19
    Cool. So now I can get my blood drawn every month instead of getting a CT scan. Guess I’ll just add that to my list of things I don’t want to do but have to.
  • Image placeholder

    Harry Nguyen

    December 19, 2025 AT 22:55
    America’s obsession with quick fixes. You think a blood test solves cancer? We used to fight wars with courage. Now we just pay for a lab report and call it science. Pathetic.
  • Image placeholder

    Philip Kristy Wijaya

    December 21, 2025 AT 05:11
    The notion that circulating tumor DNA constitutes a reliable biomarker is fundamentally flawed. One must consider the confounding influence of apoptosis in nonmalignant tissues, the stochastic nature of DNA shedding, and the epigenetic noise inherent in aging hematopoietic lineages. To treat this as diagnostic is to confuse correlation with causation. The literature is rife with overinterpretation. The data is not the truth. The data is a shadow of truth.
  • Image placeholder

    Katie Allan

    December 21, 2025 AT 07:58
    I’ve seen this change lives. My friend’s oncologist switched her treatment based on ctDNA rising before her scan showed anything. She’s still here today. This isn’t about tech-it’s about listening to the body in a new way. We’re not replacing scans or biopsies. We’re adding a voice to the conversation. And that voice? It’s saving people.

Write a comment

Recent-posts

Calcitonin and Its Impact on Fracture Healing: What the Evidence Shows

Top 10 Alternatives to Rxconnected for Affordable Prescription Medications in 2025

Rhatany Supplement: Unlocking the Ancient Herbal Remedy for Modern Wellness

Astralean: Clenbuterol Supplement Guide, Effects, Dosage & Safety

Chronic Opioid-Induced Nausea: Diet, Hydration, and Medication Options That Actually Work